water tap, brass, tap-2515657.jpg 14Jan, 2024
Water Fluoridation: History, Compounds, and Regulations + Removing It!

Water fluoridation in the United Kingdom has a rich history dating back to the 1950s when the first scheme was introduced in Birmingham. Since then, various regions have implemented water fluoridation programs to differing extents. It’s essential to recognize that decisions regarding water fluoridation are typically made locally, and not all areas in the UK have embraced this practice.

Types of Fluoride Compounds and Their Origins

Understanding the common fluoride compounds and their origins sheds light on the diverse applications of fluorine in various industries:

  1. Sodium Fluoride (NaF): Source: Naturally occurring in minerals like cryolite, also produced synthetically. Application: Used in toothpaste and water fluoridation.
  2. Calcium Fluoride (CaF2): Source: Found in minerals like fluorite. Application: Used in aluminum production, metallurgy, and optical component manufacturing.
  3. Hydrogen Fluoride (HF): Source: Industrially produced from fluorite or as a by-product in phosphoric acid and aluminum production. Application: Used in fluorocarbons, refrigerants, and various chemicals.
  4. Fluorosilicic Acid (H2SiF6): Source: By-product of the phosphate fertiliser industry. Application: Used in water fluoridation and various industrial processes.
  5. Aluminum Fluoride (AlF3): Source: By-product in aluminum manufacture. Application: Used in aluminum production, ceramics, and glass manufacturing.
  6. Fluorocarbons (CFCs, HCFCs, HFCs): Source: Synthetic compounds with fluorine, used in refrigeration and aerosol propellants. Application: Industrial refrigerants, solvents, and propellants.
  7. Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Perfluorooctanesulfonic Acid (PFOS): Source: Synthetic compounds used in non-stick cookware and waterproof fabrics. Application: Despite being phased out, they persist in the environment.
  8. Fluoride in Industrial Air Cleaning Scrubbers: Source: Emissions from industrial processes captured in air cleaning scrubbers. Application: Prevents environmental contamination by removing fluoride from industrial emissions.
  9. Fluorinated Pharmaceuticals, like fluoxetine (Prozac).
  10. Fluoride (All Forms) Melts Concrete! 

 

Water Fluoridation: A Chronological History and Regulations

A chronological overview highlights key milestones in water fluoridation history:

  • 1940s-1950s: United States
    Grand Rapids, Michigan initiated the first water fluoridation program in 1945. U.S. Public Health Service endorsed water fluoridation in 1950.
  • 1960s-1970s: United Kingdom
    Water fluoridation trials began in the UK in the 1960s. The Water (Fluoridation) Act of 1985 provided a legal framework.
  • 1980s-1990s: United States
    The Safe Drinking Water Act in 1974 granted EPA authority to regulate contaminants. In 2015, recommended fluoride levels were revised to 0.7 milligrams per liter.
  • 2000s-2010s: Australia
    Water fluoridation began in Australia in the 1950s. State governments mandate water fluoridation, leading to public debates.
  • 2020s: Canada
    Water fluoridation practices vary by province. Local municipalities decide on water fluoridation, causing differing practices.

Regulations and Mandates:

  • United Kingdom: The Water (Fluoridation) Act of 1985 guides England’s health authorities, with devolved decisions in Scotland and Wales.
  • Australia: State-level regulations, e.g., Queensland’s Water Fluoridation Act 2008.
  • Canada: Local decisions on fluoridation.
  • United States: EPA sets maximum allowable fluoride levels; local water authorities decide on fluoridation.

Conclusion

Water fluoridation continues to be a hot topic of debate, focusing on so-called ‘public’ health benefits, ethics, and individual choice. Legal framework and regulations adapt to address concerns while allegedly promoting oral health.  Understanding the history, compounds, and regulations surrounding water fluoridation is crucial for informed discussions on its benefits and risks.

Water Distillers: The Optimal Choice for Ensuring Pure and Safe Drinking Water

When it comes to securing the purest and safest drinking water, water distillers stand out as the superior option. The distillation process, involving the conversion of water into steam and subsequent condensation, is unparalleled in its efficacy for removing a wide spectrum of impurities.

Key Advantages of Water Distillers:

  1. Comprehensive Contaminant Removal:
    • The distillation process excels in eliminating minerals, heavy metals, fluoride, chlorine, graphene oxide, pharmaceuticals, mold, and various other impurities. This ensures that the water produced is exceptionally pure and free from a diverse range of contaminants.
  2. Versatility in Purification:
    • Water distillers effectively address a multitude of contaminants, making them versatile for creating a safe water supply. Whether targeting chemicals, pathogens, or emerging pollutants, the distillation method provides a thorough purification solution.
  3. Independence from Water Source Quality:
    • Water distillers are not dependent on the quality of the water source. Regardless of the initial contamination levels, the distillation process reliably produces water of high purity, making it a dependable choice for diverse water supplies.
  4. Minimal Maintenance Requirements:
    • Distillation systems have relatively straightforward maintenance requirements. Periodic cleaning and attention to essential components ensure consistent performance, making them a practical choice for hassle-free water purification.
  5. Energy Efficiency Considerations:
    • While distillation is acknowledged as energy-intensive, its energy efficiency can be optimized through advancements in technology and system design. Selecting modern distillation units can enhance the overall energy efficiency of the process.
  6. Elevated Assurance of Safety:
    • Water distillers provide an elevated level of assurance regarding water safety. The comprehensive removal of contaminants, including pharmaceuticals, mold, graphene oxide, and even Radiation contributes to the production of water that meets the highest standards of purity.

 

Reverse Osmosis (RO) vs. Zero Water Pitcher: A Comparative Analysis

1. Purification Process:

  • Reverse Osmosis (RO):
    • RO utilizes a semi-permeable membrane to filter out contaminants. Water is forced through the membrane, effectively removing minerals, heavy metals, and other impurities.
  • Zero Water Pitcher:
    • Zero Water pitchers use a combination of activated carbon and an ion exchange resin to reduce total dissolved solids (TDS), which includes minerals and some impurities.

2. Contaminant Removal:

  • Reverse Osmosis (RO):
    • RO systems are highly effective in removing a wide range of contaminants, including minerals, heavy metals, fluoride, chlorine, and other impurities. They can achieve a high level of purification, often exceeding 95% removal of dissolved solids.
  • Zero Water Pitcher:
    • Zero Water pitchers are effective in reducing TDS, including minerals, but they may not remove certain contaminants as comprehensively as RO systems. The performance can vary based on the initial water quality.

3. Wastewater Generation:

  • Reverse Osmosis (RO):
    • RO systems generate wastewater as a byproduct. The amount of wastewater produced depends on the system’s design and efficiency.
  • Zero Water Pitcher:
    • Zero Water pitchers do not generate wastewater during the purification process. They rely on gravity to filter water through the cartridge, with excess water collected in the pitcher.

4. Convenience and Ease of Use:

  • Reverse Osmosis (RO):
    • RO systems are typically installed under the sink or as point-of-use systems. They require professional installation and are not as portable or convenient as pitcher filters.
  • Zero Water Pitcher:
    • Zero Water pitchers are portable and easy to use. They don’t require installation, making them suitable for use in various settings. However, their capacity is limited to the pitcher size.

5. Maintenance:

  • Reverse Osmosis (RO):
    • RO systems require regular maintenance, including membrane replacement and periodic sanitization. Maintenance can be more involved compared to pitcher filters.
  • Zero Water Pitcher:
    • Zero Water pitcher filters need replacement at regular intervals. The frequency depends on water quality and usage. Replacement is generally straightforward.

6. Cost:

  • Reverse Osmosis (RO):
    • RO systems usually have higher upfront costs, including installation. They may also incur ongoing maintenance expenses.
  • Zero Water Pitcher:
    • Zero Water pitchers have lower initial costs and do not require professional installation. However, ongoing filter replacements contribute to long-term costs.

In conclusion, water distillers emerge as the optimal choice for those prioritizing safe and pure drinking water. Their unparalleled ability to remove a broad range of contaminants ensures that the water produced is of the highest quality, making them a reliable and effective solution for households and communities alike.

Timer Controlled Digital Water Distiller & Glass Jug + Free Next Day Delivery – £109.95

Browse Our Range

 

brown bricked church 4Jan, 2024
The Real Solfeggio

In the world of music, Guido of Arezzo, an 11th-century Italian monk, stands as a pioneer and innovator. His contributions to the field, particularly in the development of musical notation and the Solfeggio System, have left a lasting impact on how we understand and perform music today.

Before Guido’s work, there were various methods for notating music, but they lacked standardization and widespread adoption. Guido’s invention of modern musical notation revolutionized the way music was written and preserved. He introduced a system of lines and spaces, known as a staff, which represented specific pitches. This breakthrough allowed for precise communication of musical ideas and paved the way for the vast repertoire of music we have today.

One of Guido’s most significant contributions is the development of the Solfeggio System. This system uses the syllables “ut,” “re,” “mi,” “fa,” “sol,” “la” (which later evolved into “do,” “re,” “mi,” “fa,” “sol,” “la”) to represent specific pitches. Guido’s use of these syllables can be traced back to the “Ut queant laxis” hymn. Each syllable corresponded to a particular pitch, providing singers with a way to learn and remember melodies more easily.

Guido’s solmisation system, as it came to be known, is still widely used in music education today. It serves as a foundation for teaching pitch and sight-singing, enabling musicians to develop their ear and vocal abilities. By assigning syllables to different pitches, Guido created a universal language for musicians to communicate and understand music.

The Solfeggio System’s influence extends beyond its educational value. Some believe that the specific frequencies associated with each syllable in the Solfeggio scale have spiritual and healing properties. According to this belief, each frequency resonates with certain qualities, such as balance, harmony, and spiritual awakening. However, it is important to note that to experience the healing benefits associated with the Solfeggio scale, it must be tuned to a reference pitch of A=432Hz.

It is worth mentioning that while the Solfeggio System has gained popularity in the realm of alternative healing and meditation, scientific evidence supporting its claims is limited. The healing properties attributed to the Solfeggio scale are often based on anecdotal experiences rather than rigorous scientific research. As with any alternative practice, it is essential to approach it with an open mind while also considering evidence-based approaches to health and well-being.

Buyer Beware! – As many so called ‘Healing & Meditation’ tracks are recorded in the base frequency of A=440Hz.

Solfeggio SyllableFrequency (Hz)Associated Benefit
UT or DO396Liberating Guilt and Fear
RE417Undoing Situations and Facilitating Change
MI528Transformation, Miracles, and DNA Repair
FA639Connecting/Relationships
SOL741Expression/Solutions
LA852Awakening Intuition
TI or SI963Spiritual Order and Higher Consciousness
Frequencies many claim can heal.

The Real Solfeggio By: Jamie Buturff

Piano Tuned – A=440Hz – Solfeggio?

A=110Hz also vibrates at harmonics of 220Hz, 330Hz, 440Hz

The Importance of 432

The choice of A=432 Hz or A=440 Hz has a cascading effect on the entire piano scale, both mathematically and geometrically. The relationships between frequencies, waveforms, and resonances are altered, impacting the overall sound and character of the instrument.

Tuning a musical instrument or software synth to different reference pitches, such as A=432 Hz or A=440 Hz, affects every other note in various ways, considering the mathematical, harmonic, and geometric aspects.

Note Scale at 440 Hz Scale at 432 Hz
A0 27.5 Hz 27 Hz
A1 55 Hz 54 Hz
A2 110 Hz 108 Hz
A3 220 Hz 216 Hz
A4 440 Hz 432 Hz
A5 880 Hz 864 Hz
A6 1760 Hz 1728 Hz
A7 3520 Hz 3456 Hz

Pythagoras, Marko Rodin, and the Most Harmonic Numbers

Revealing the musical scale through which the Divine Universe was created.

After watching this video, how could you possibly believe the Heart Chakra frequency could be anything other than 512Hz in the A=432Hz scale.

Request any song in 432Hz

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Name *
Loading
brown wooden mortar and pestle 1Jan, 2024
A=440Hz vs. A=432Hz

When it comes to the frequency of sound, there has been a long-standing debate about the effects of different tuning standards on various aspects of our lives. One such aspect is the impact on pH levels in our environment. In this article, we will explore the differences between A=440Hz and A=432Hz and their effects on pH.

Firstly, it is important to understand that pH is a measure of the acidity or alkalinity of a substance. A pH of 7 is considered neutral, while values below 7 indicate acidity and values above 7 indicate alkalinity.

Now, let’s delve into the effects of A=440Hz and A=432Hz on pH. A=440Hz is commonly used as the standard tuning for musical instruments. This frequency is known for its electric and vibrant qualities. Some proponents of A=440Hz believe that it can stimulate energy and enhance focus.

On the other hand, A=432Hz is often associated with a more magnetic and calming effect. It is believed to resonate with the natural vibrations of the universe and promote a sense of harmony and relaxation. Some individuals claim that A=432Hz can have a positive impact on our overall well-being.

While there are anecdotal reports of individuals experiencing changes in pH levels when exposed to different frequencies, scientific evidence supporting these claims is limited. The effects of sound frequencies on pH are complex and can vary depending on numerous factors.

It is worth noting that the impact of sound frequencies on pH is a topic that requires further research and exploration. While some people may perceive differences in pH levels when exposed to A=440Hz or A=432Hz, it is essential to approach these claims with a critical mindset.

Here’s Jamie Buturff with More: